Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 643 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6200 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 8% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $42.85 vs $46.41
- Up to 6% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1820 - $0.34 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2832 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |