Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than FX-6200 - 694 vs 680 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6200 - $39.9 vs $42.85
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
