Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6200 is 138 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6200 - $39.99 vs $42.85
- Up to 5% better value when playing Fortnite than FX-6200 - $0.19 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 812 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |