Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6200 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6200 is 781 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G6950.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Pentium G6950 - 97 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Pentium G6950 - $42.85 vs $47.48
- Up to 10% better value when playing New World than Pentium G6950 - $0.44 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 73 vs 125 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |