Buy on Amazon
$37.93
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 2651 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $37.93 vs $95.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 1400 - $0.18 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G6950 - 213 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
210
98.59154929577466%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.93
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $37.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
AMD YD1400BBAEBOX Ryzen 5 1400 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
34.141201264488934%
Multi-Core
517
16.68818592640413%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 73 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
