Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2612 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $42.85 vs $56.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 75% better in FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - 159 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 23% better value when playing FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - $0.36 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13473 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |