Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 174 vs 165 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $45.0 vs $56.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9100F - $0.27 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3403 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |