Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 987 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-9100F - 153 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $49.99 vs $85.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |