Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1433 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $45.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 39% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - $0.27 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6204 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |