Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 945 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 151 vs 150 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $39.9 vs $68.02
- Up to 40% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G4900 - $0.27 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |