Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-4130 - 276 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $22.92 vs $39.9
- Up to 43% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - $0.08 vs $0.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6975 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |