Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 730 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3420 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 47% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $21.1 vs $39.9
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - $0.19 vs $0.36 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G3420 3.2 GHz Used Dual-Core CPU Processor 3M 53W LGA 1150
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
