Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G540 - 171 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 52% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $19.25 vs $39.9
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dota 2 than Celeron G3900 - $0.12 vs $0.23 per FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
164
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |