Buy on Amazon
$22.92
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 15% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $22.92 vs $26.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - $0.21 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
