Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-3240T - 216 vs 213 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $25.7 vs $95.31
- Up to 73% better value when playing Death Stranding than Pentium G4400 - $0.12 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
27.27272727272727%
Price, $
$95.31
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2042 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
213
98.61111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |