Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2790 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $25.7 vs $94.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.15 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than Core i3-3240T - 184 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
176
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |