Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 355 vs 352 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $59.99 vs $89.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.17 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |