Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 752 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 198 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $68.02 vs $89.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.42 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |