Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $68.02 vs $70.0
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - $0.55 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |