Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $68.02 vs $99.9
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.3 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G4900 - 232 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
225
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |