Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - $68.02 vs $88.2
- Up to 20% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium Gold G6405 - $0.44 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 54 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16189 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
80%
Price, $
$88.2
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |