Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 156 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $53.55 vs $69.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Athlon 200GE - $0.34 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - 167 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
95.20958083832335%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1618 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
80.95238095238096%
Price, $
$69.99
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1618 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
69.29133858267717%
Multi-Core
1051
56.596661281637054%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |