Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 156 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 3% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $68.02 vs $69.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 200GE - $0.35 vs $0.36 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G4900 - 197 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
193
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |