Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 385 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - 203 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $57.99 vs $68.02
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - $0.29 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |