Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $68.02 vs $115.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400F - $0.36 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 210 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
65%
Price, $
$115.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |