Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 180 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $53.55 vs $74.64
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75168 minutes ago
Buy for $74.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
45.52845528455284%
Multi-Core
1051
22.13563605728728%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |