Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 640 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 274 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $83.78 vs $112.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-8400 - $0.31 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
75.60975609756098%
Price, $
$112
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4411 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
97.8102189781022%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
77.75314116777533%
Multi-Core
3013
63.45829823083403%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |