Buy on Amazon
$81.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $81.39 vs $84.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105 - $0.3 vs $0.31 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 277 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
