Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 15% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-2400 - 260 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $34.95 vs $89.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10105 - $0.15 vs $0.35 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16143 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
226
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |