Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 933 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $81.39 vs $94.98
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-12100F - $0.41 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3200G - 218 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
93%
Price, $
$94.98
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |