Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than FX-8320 - 215 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $74.82 vs $83.62
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $83.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73804 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |