Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 160% better in League of Legends than FX-8320 - 148 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-8320 - $103.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-8320 - $0.7 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8214 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |