Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 1% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - $74.82 vs $75.34
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 44% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8320 - 69 vs 48 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74005 minutes ago
Buy for $75.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |