Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-8320 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8320 - $93.74 vs $175.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Control than FX-8320 - $0.46 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |