Buy on Amazon
$74.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $74.82 vs $89.5
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8320 - 159 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74004 minutes ago
SIVOYEEL CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 R5 2600X 3.6GHz 6-Core 12-Thread 95W CPU Processor LGA AM4
Buy for $89.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-8320 or Ryzen 5 2600X
Halo Infinite, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
35 FPS
$42.86/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Ryzen 5 2600X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
