Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 276 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than FX-8320 - $99.95 vs $175.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8320 - $0.36 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |