Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than FX-8320 - 233 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-8320 - $136.5 vs $175.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Fortnite than FX-8320 - $0.59 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |