Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $175.0 vs $207.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 5 7600X - $1.17 vs $1.25 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8320 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
93%
Price, $
$207.99
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $207.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |