Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $175.0 vs $177.2
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 40% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - 249 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - $0.71 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$177.2
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $177.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |