Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $175.0 vs $1199.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 5 5600X - $1.79 vs $9.09 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 35% better in New World than FX-8320 - 132 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.09/FPS
19%
Price, $
$1199.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |