Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 56% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 249 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $81.39 vs $177.45
- Up to 28% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-12600K - $0.51 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
71%
Price, $
$177.45
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $177.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |