Buy on Amazon
$74.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $154
Availability
MSRP in USD: $154
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - $74.82 vs $104.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320 - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74392 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G, 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $104 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
