Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 164 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-8320 - $98.15 vs $175.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8320 - $0.6 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |