Buy on Amazon
$95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $95.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-8100 - $0.14 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than FX-8320 - 708 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
95.05649717514125%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8320FRHKBOX FX-8320 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition Processor
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5919 minutes ago
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
708
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
73.6842105263158%
Price, $
$135
70%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
