Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8320 and the cheaper FX-8300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-8320 - $112.02 vs $175.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8320 - $0.97 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8633 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |