Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $175.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600X - $1.58 vs $1.69 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2229 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |