Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $112.02 vs $189.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 7600 - $1.14 vs $1.41 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 37% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8300 - 134 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5299 minutes ago
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |