Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $112.02 vs $229.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400 - $0.97 vs $1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 152 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5647 minutes ago
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5646 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |