Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 286 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-8320 - $165.86 vs $175.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8320 - $0.58 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2442 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |