Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 326 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 164 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $94.99 vs $165.86
- Up to 41% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.6 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
59%
Price, $
$165.86
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
159
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |