Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-4930K - 273 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $89.95 vs $165.86
- Up to 36% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600KF - $0.39 vs $0.61 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
63%
Price, $
$165.86
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3477 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
229
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |